Two Tenancy Contracts from the 1700s

Most farmers in the Netherlands were tenants, not owners. This can make it hard to find out where they lived, since we can usually only find deeds for the owners, not the tenants.

Since so many of us descend from tenant farmers, I thought I’d share two tenancy contracts with you that I found for my ancestors. It is rare to find such a contract, since these deals were often made informally and if put in writing, the landlord would keep a copy and the tenant would be a copy. Usually, no copy would be filed in court or held by a notary. The only way to find these contracts is in family or house archives. Some of these archives are still in private hands, others have been transferred or microfilmed by public repositories.

Example: Tenancy contract of Teube ten Haaken and Hinderze Dondervoord

Some of my Winterswijk ancestors worked on farms that belonged to the Meerdink estate. The archive of that estate has been preserved and is still in the family. The family allowed the Gelders Archief, the provincial archives of Gelderland, to create a microfilm copy. A finding aid of the estate records is available at the website of the Gelders Archief under number 0535, “Scholtengoed Meerdink.”

Call number 77 has a tenancy contract from 1775 for the Meerdinkhaken farm, a small farm on the Meerdink estate.

Tenancy contract
Tenancy contract

Here is an abstract of this record:

The undersigned, “scholte” Jan te Lintum and Aaltjen Mierdink, spouses, rented or gave in tenancy their farm Mierdink Haken in the hamlet of Woold near Winterswijk, belonging to the Mierdink estate, and such to Tuebe ten Haaken and Hinderze Dondervoord spouses, under the following conditions:

  • The lease is for twelve consecutive years, starting “Petrij” [Saint Peter] 1775. The lease can be cancelled by either party after six years, with six months notice.
  • The tenants will have use of the house and other carpentry, both gardens, hay and meadow land, and promise to pay twelve guilders per year, first to be paid May 1776. They shall also serve with their bodies eight men’s days and eight women’s days with their yoke. They will also pay all the taxes for said farm.
  • The tenants will take the third sheaf from the farm land and will thresh it, and bring the seeds into the house of the owner as is customary. The tenants shall be responsible for the upkeep of the house, carpentry, gardens and farm land. If they do not, they will forfeit their lease.

20 February 1775

[signed]

Jan te Lintum
Aaltjen Mierdink
Teube ten Haaken
This: ++ is the mark of Hinderze Dondervoord drawn by holding her pen.

Isn’t this a wonderful treasure trove of information? It doesn’t just tell us who leased the farm, but it also tells us a little bit about life on the farm. For the privilege of working the Ten Haken farm, Teube ten Haaken and Hinderze Dondervoord (in other records known as Dondergoor) had to pay an annual rent plus one-third of their harvest to the landlord. In addition, they both had to work on the landlord’s land for eight days of the year, and bring a yoke of oxen to boot. And you can bet that these eight “help days” would fall in harvest time, when they were desperately needed on their own farm.

The difference in wealth between the landlord and the tenant is obvious from their signatures. The owners, Jan te Lintum and Aaltjen Mierdink, both sign with a flowing hand. Tenant Teube ten Haaken can also sign his name, although a bit less practiced than Jan. But Teube’s wife Hinderze doesn’t know how to write. Like many illiterate people in this area, she signs with a mark, but she even needed somebody to hold her pen for that.

This is an area where people named themselves after the farm. From his name, we can see that Teube ten Haaken already lived on this farm, as he was named after it.

Example: Tenancy contract of Thoebe Smalbraeck and Christina Meerdink

In the same package of contracts, we find an older tenancy contract of 1712 whereby Thoebe Smalbrack and Christina Meerdink leased the same Meerdinkhaken farm.

Tenancy contract 1712
Tenancy contract 1712

Here is an abstract of this record:

“Scholte” Jan Meerdinck and Lijsken Damcatte his spouse, rented and leased their farm called Het Haaken in the hamlet of Woold, to Thoebe Smalbrack and Christina Meerdink, spouses, as it was leased before to Thoebe, for the sum of 45 guilders per year, the first rent to start in May 1712 and end in May 1713. The lease will be for twelve years but can be cancelled after six years with three months’ notice. Jan Meerdinck will be indebted to Thoebe te Smalbraeck for a dowry 192 guilders and six years interest of 100 “daler” [1.50 guilder coins] calculated unti; May 1712, for a sum of 36 guilders, so combined 228 guilders. The 45 guilders will be taken from the 228 guilders yearly, and no interest will be charged on the 228 guilders or the 100 daler that Meerdink still owes Thoebe as long as the lease lasts.
Scholte Meerdinck promises to build a decent house at the Haaken, and Thoebe shall be responsible for the upkeep.
2 March 1712

[signed]

Jan Merdinck
This X is the mark of Lisken ten Damkatte drawn by holding her pen
Tebe Smalbrack
Chrijstina Meerdinck I
[…] witness
David Wijginck as witness
Jan Hijndrick Polhuijs as witness

Additional research showed that Jan Meerdinck and Lijsken ten Damkatte were the grandparents of both Jan te Lintum and Aeltjen Mierdink, the landlords  in the 1775 record (Jan and Aeltjen were first cousins, keeping the estate together). Thoebe Smalbraeck and Christina Meerdink were the grandparents of Teube ten Haaken, the tenant in the 1775 record. The tenant’s wife in 1712, Christina Meerdink,  was the sister of the landlord in 1712, Jan Meerdink, which explains why the landlord owed the tenant money for a dowry. Theube and Christina got several years of free rent in lieu of her dowry.

The two contracts have a similar term of twelve years, but the tone is quite different. This 1712 contract is a deal between family members, not just a landlord and his tenant. Theube and Christina were not required to work on the landlord’s estate, like their grandchildren were required to sixty years later.

It is interesting that Theube and Christina paid a fixed rent (45 guilders) while their grandchildren paid a rent that was partly fixed (12 guilders) and partly in kind (1/3 of the harvest). Usually, rents in kind got changed to rents in money over time, not the other way around. The reason for the rent in money in 1712 may have been that it was used to pay back the dowry.

The 1712 contract also explains why Theube Smalbraeck starts calling himself Ten Haken around this time: he lived on the Ten Haken farm, which he rented from his wife’s brother. His children and grandchildren were called Ten Haken too, all living on the same farm. Their descendants were tenants on that farm until the mid 1900s at least. The farm still exists today, although the building has been changed.

We tend to think of tenancy as short-term leases, but this example shows that these relationships can last for multiple generations. It teaches us that searching the catalogs for unusual record groups can pay off and provide us with unique records that offer a rare glimpse into our ancestors lives.

Cousin connection?

I know that there are several readers of this blog and newsletter who also have ancestors from Winterswijk. I would not be surprised if several of you recognized the names in this article. If so, please drop me a line in the comments 🙂

Feel free to reuse the information for your own trees, provided you credit me as the source. The scans are in the public domain. Suggested citation:

Yvette Hoitink, “Two Tenancy Contracts from the 1700s,” Dutch Genealogy (https://www.dutchgenealogy.nl/two-tenancy-contracts-from-the-1700s/ : published 22 April 2016).
About Yvette Hoitink

Yvette Hoitink, CG®, QG™ is a professional genealogist in the Netherlands. She holds the Certified Genealogist credential from the Board for Certification of Genealogists and has a post-graduate diploma in Family and Local History from the University of Dundee. She has been doing genealogy for over 30 years and helps people from across the world find their ancestors in the Netherlands. Read about Yvette's professional genealogy services.

Comments

  1. Hello Yvette! Yes, an article like this from you has me scrambling to see how I can link to the people you write about. I am heavily using your own database!

    I seem to have confused a Ten Hoege for a Ten Haken …

    The tradition of changing names when you change farms dismays me some. Just because it seems so much harder to track. Also, when I see you write about a Meerdinck, for instance, I can’t confidently say my Meerdinks must be related to them, since that may not be true at all!

    • To really fry your brain: did you know there were two Meerdink farms in Winterswijk? One was in Henxel (Jeurden and descendants) and one in Woold (Derck and descendants). I descend once from the Henxel clan one about a dozen times from the Woold clan.

    • But if you tell me the names of your Meerdinks, I should be able to tell if and how they fit in.

      • Okay! Let me see …
        Jan Hendrik Meerdink b. 4 Sep 1842 in Winterswijk. Married Bertha Hisler in Muscatine, Iowa. His daughter Ella Meerdink married my great-grandfather’s cousin, Fred Schreurs, the cousin my great-grandfather went into business with. Ella was widowed with young children when Fred Schreurs walked into an elevator shaft, thinking the elevator was there.

        Safety has improved since then, I think.

        Or Carolina and Anna Meerdink, the sisters who may have both been murdered by Hendrik Jan Warnshuis after each marrying him in French Creek, NY. I don’t know if they were my relations, but alas, their husband was a cousin to my 3X great-grandmother.

        Interestingly, it seems my family tree is lousy with Meerdinks (for instance, George Washington Meerdink married Bessie Reesink, the daughter of Catherine Freers who was my 2X great-aunt) but I haven’t found any in my direct ancestry, so far.

        • Jan Hendrik Meerdink was born out of wedlock and was acknowledged when his mother married a Meerdink a year after his birth. His (legal) father is a descendant of Derck Meerdinck from Woold. Here’s Jan Hendrik Meerdink in my tree.
          Carolina Meerdink was a cousin of his. See Carolina Meerdink in my tree.
          Anna Geertruida Meerdink, the second wife of Hendrik Jan Warnshuis, was not Carolina’s sister but her distant cousin. See Anna Geertruida Meerdink in my tree.
          My tree on that website is a bit outdated, I have since done more work but that is only synchronized to my Ancestry tree. See Jennie Schreurs in my Ancestry tree. I haven’t found that you are descended from any Meerdinks yet but did find a couple of hundred other ancestors of yours.

          • Wow, hundreds. Thanks so much. I’m just going to copy that part of your tree, if you don’t mind. 🙂 And in your tree I did find a Meerdink in my direct line: Geesen Meerdink in the 1600s married to Jan Ros. (But their son was named Wessel Koks? Is that another farm name?)

            Have you ever noticed if we are related? I haven’t tracked that.

            • Hi Teresa,

              You’re welcome 🙂 And feel free to use the information in my tree if you attribute me as the source. If you use Ancestry for your tree, you can use the hints at Ancestry to connect the information to your Ancestry tree, in which Ancestry will cite my tree as the source for you.

              And yes, we are related in several different ways. Among our shared ancestors are Frederik Jan Schreurs (1729-1805) and Berendina Geertruit te Haveste (1722-1784), my 6th great-grandparents; Willem Oelewick (1684-1734) and Berendeken Bonnink (1684-1758), my 7th great-grandparents; Jan ten Coldenbargh (?-?) and his wife Aeltjen, my 8th great-grandparents and many others further back.

              Geesken Meerdinck is a daughter of Wessel Meerdinck from the Henxel farm by that name. I suspect he is a son of Jeurden Meerdinck but have not been able to prove that yet. Wessel Meerdinck from Henxel married Jenneken Kockes which is how the family ended up on the Koks farm. Geesken must have taken over her parents’ farm and her husband Jan Ros moved in with her, which explained why some of their children were known as Koks.

              Buurtschap.info has a photo of the Meerdink farm in Henxel.

              • We should create a geographical project at FTDNA for the Achterhoek. You have your uncle’s DNA and I can get some Freers YDNA (I don’t know any Schreurs men, at the moment). Mary could help. I’m only half joking about this. They make geographic projects as well as surname projects. I am already the administrator of the Bixby surname project (my mother’s maiden name). It would be so interesting to track the haplogroups that entered and settled in the Achterhoek.

  2. Thelma Heil says

    Hi Yvette, My great great grandfather, Jan Hendrik ten Hulsen, was born 8 August 1800 on the Hulsen in Dorpboer, the sixth generation of the family to live on that farm. He married in 1821 with Maria Mentink. I believe their three children were born on the Hulsen. It appears that in 1835 Jan Hendrik and his family moved from the Hulsen to the Mengers in Henxel. This puzzles me a bit. Why did they move, after all those generations on the Hulsen, to the Mengers? Any thoughts on this subject?

  3. kristen Palmer says

    Hello Yvette,
    My fifth great grandfather was Hendrick Weijenborg born in Winterswijk on Januaruy 22 1712 and he died in Winterswijk 1775. The surname was changed to Weinborg when his great grandson Johann Berand Weinborg came to America…I believe my father and two brothers are the last Weinborgs left in the USA. I would appreciate it if you had an information on The Weijenborgs and their life in Winterswijk. Thank you,
    All the best.Kristen Weinborg Palmer

Leave a Reply to Yvette Hoitink Cancel reply

*