Column – Reuse

Since 18 July 2015, the Netherlands has a law to regulate the reuse of government information. The law is intended to give an impulse to the economy if government information is used as fuel for new products and services. The law requires archives to cooperate in the reuse of government information. They can only charge the marginal costs for providing copies of the information. Costs that have been made to create the information may not be recouped.

two women packing candles in an assembly line

Women working in a candle factory, 1919. Credits: J.D. Filarski, collection Nationaal Archief (no known copyrights)

Digitized records fall within the scope of the law. The costs for providing a download of a scan that is available online are negligible; I can’t think of anything other than bandwidth costs. For scans that are not available online, the time an employee spends on creating a copy and the cost for the carrier on which the information is copied may be charged.

As a result of this law, several Dutch archives have already stopped charging for downloads, or are working on changing their websites to eliminate the charges. Other archives still charge fees for viewing or downloading scans. Whether this is legal remains to be seen, it’s too early for case law.

At first glance, this law appears to be a big benefit for genealogists, since we will have to pay less to view scans. But I wonder if this will be such a great development in the long run. Many archives used the proceeds of the downloads to finance digitization projects. Now that that source of income dries up, scanning projects will also slow down, unless archives will be compensated for the loss of income. As a result, fewer sources will become available online than if this law had not been introduced.

As a professional genealogist, I’m a good example of how this law could work. There are several sources I use a lot that I would love to have on my own hard drives. That would allow me to quickly brows the scans, making my research more efficient. Research that is now too time-consuming and expensive, would become cheaper, which could lead to more projects. In the long run, I could even hire people to assist me. Some of that money would flow back to the government in the form of taxes. If they use that money to fund digitization projects, we will have a situation where everyone benefits.


A Dutch version of this column first appeared in the December 2015 issue of Gen, the quarterly magazine of the Centraal Bureau voor Genealogie.
About Yvette Hoitink

Yvette Hoitink is a professional genealogist in the Netherlands. She has been doing genealogy for almost 25 years. Her expertise is helping people from across the world find their ancestors in the Netherlands. Read about Yvette's professional genealogy services.

Comments

  1. Yvette,

    The reuse law you mention was made and implemented based on directive 2013/37/EU of the Europan parliament and of the council of 26 June 2013, amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information, see http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013L0037&from=NL

    As you can see in article 2 of the directive (on the last page), Member States had to adopt and publish the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive no later then 18 July 2015.

    So the Dutch made that deadline. But I assume other European countries did as well. So it’s interesting to see how re-use in general and re-use of archival information takes form in other European countries!

    Bob Coret

Leave comment

*