Was your ancestor born in Reusel-De Mierden, Noord-Brabant? Guess again!

When I look at online trees, especially on Ancestry.com, I often see “Reusel, Reusel-de Mierden, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands” listed as the place of birth. At first I was puzzled how all these people with names that are typical for Friesland, Groningen or Gelderland would have children in a village on the other side of the country. There was obviously something wrong there. But then I started using FamilyTreeMaker and tried to resolve some place names. Guess what? “Holland” resolves to “Reusel, Reusel-de Mierden, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands.” Say what?

Holland is not a country, it’s a street…

“Holland” is listed as the place of birth in many US sources, such as census records or marriage records. Usually, it refers to the country the Netherlands, which is officially called The Netherlands but often mistakenly called Holland.

When you record “Holland” as the place of birth, and then try to automatically resolve that to a geographical name that is located on the map, the program starts to look for a geographical location named Holland. Earlier versions of FamilyTreeMaker didn’t find the country, but it found a street called ‘t Holland (or the woodland) in the village of Reusel in Noord-Brabant. It then changed the place name ‘Holland’ to ‘Reusel, Reusel-De Mierden, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands’.

Streetview image of the Holland road

‘t Holland in Reusel. Image credits: Google Streetview

The good news is that this problem has been fixed, “Netherlands” is now the first suggestion that comes up when you try to resolve “Holland.” But there are thousands of people in online trees that still have “Reusel, Reusel-de Mierden, Noord-Brabant, Netherlands” instead of Holland as their place of birth.

Since many genealogists just copy information from online trees without going back to the underlying sources, this mistake has found its way to trees at Ancestry.com, Familysearch, MyHeritage and several paper publications. I predict that this mythical place name will continue to confuse researchers for generations to come. Since knowing the place of origin is vital in tracing your immigrant ancestor, I’m sure this mistake has caused many brick walls.

What are the chances your ancestor really is from Reusel?

Reusel is a very small village in Noord-Brabant, with a population of less than 1,000 in 1849.1 Not many people emigrated from the area so the chances that your (immigrant) ancestor is actually from Reusel are very VERY small.

If you want to make sure, just check your sources and see where the information came from. If it came from an online tree or another undocumented publication, I would be very suspicious. But if you found the place name in an original record, it could be legit, especially if other family members were also from Noord-Brabant.


Reusel in 1867. Image credits: Wikimedia Commons.

Check your own tree

If you’ve ever used online trees to find information about your ancestors, I advise you to check your own tree for people born in Reusel. If you have any, I would really appreciate it if you would leave a comment and share your thoughts. Let’s all work together to debunk this myth!


I created an infographic to show the extent of this error.

  1. 1849 census, Noord-Brabant, “Eerste gedeelte. Plaatselijke Indeeling. Indeeling der bevolking naar de kunne, het verblijf, den burgerlijken staat, de geboorteplaats en de godsdienst” [Part 1, local divisision of the population into sexes, domestic situation, marrital status, place of birth and religion], Volkstellingen 1795-1971 [Censuses 1795-1971], Excel-file, accessed 8 november 2013
About Yvette Hoitink

Yvette Hoitink is a professional genealogist in the Netherlands. She has been doing genealogy for almost 25 years. Her expertise is helping people from across the world find their ancestors in the Netherlands. Read about Yvette's professional genealogy services.


  1. Horace Andrews says:

    I have traced my Dutch ancestry back to Wynant Gerritse Van Der Poel born 1617 in Reusel-de-Mierden. He married Tryntije Melgerts Rocholte from Sloterdijk Amsterdam in 1640. They then left for New York where they died. , Does it sound correct? After reading this I am in doubt. How can I find out. I will travel to the Netherlands this year and would hope to pursue this to see if any Van der Poel’s still live in the area.
    Thank you.

    • This is definitely one of the errors. Where did you find this information? Only by going back to the sources will you be able to tell the truth.
      I did a quick search on the Amsterdam city archives website and found a marriage record of Wijnant Gerritss [no last name] to Trijntie Roocholt, married Sloterdijk 21 October 1640 that shows he was from Meppel. Meppel is in the province of Drenthe, on the other side of the country from Reusel-De Mierden. I also saw that several of their children were baptized in Amsterdam. Whether this is the same couple as the couple that went to New York would require more research.

  2. Jennifer Sebrell says:

    Thank you for posting this information. I was told that some of my ancestors came from Reusel de Meirden, but upon further researching I can not find anything that fits. I have traced a Samuel Sebrell and his son Frederick Sebrell and I believe they came from the Netherlands in the 1750s, but I don’t know how true it is now. Do you know where I can find any records of Sebrells in the Netherlands.

  3. Dear Yvette,

    I spotted another site mentioning an ancestor from Reusel-De Mierden. It is http://www.sandinmyshoescapecod.blogspot.nl/p/immigrants-map.html. I informed the blog owner and mentioned this blog post. Just hope she is not too disappointed.

    Kind regards,

  4. Thank you! I thought it looked odd, having Holland listed first, and I always like to look up where people are from. My search came straight to this article, and I am so grateful! And yes, the big online tree has it all over.

Leave comment